Inexperienced Sri Lanka loosen chokehold again

Sri Lanka’s mistakes on the fourth day in Pallekele were only minor but one complacent hour turned into two, allowing Pakistan a way back into the match

Andrew Fidel Fernando in Pallekele06-Jul-2015Sri Lanka, full of pep when they had Pakistan at 13 for 2, softened their grip and deflated like a party balloon for two sessions. They were flying around the room making rude noises towards stumps. Sri Lanka had dominated this match since day two. They could even have been looking at a four-day finish. But, as has been the case everywhere from Sharjah, to Lord’s, to the Basin Reserve in January, and Galle a mere two weeks ago, one complacent hour became two, and the opposition returned to the match, inch by inch at first, then in galumphing strides.The mistakes were only minor, but this is their umpteenth airing in recent times. Angelo Mathews went for the throat briefly, but when Younis Khan and Shan Masood rebuffed him with a spate of boundaries, Sri Lanka eased off too quickly. You feel for Mathews sometimes. Aside from him, no one else in the side has played 25 Tests. There are batsmen in the side after long hiatuses, and bowlers nursing averages twice their age. This is a rag-tag motley crew of novices, and leading them to victory means not putting a foot wrong.He is clearly missing the advice of Mahela Jayawardene, and the support of Kumar Sangakkara. For this match he is without Rangana Herath’s control as well. Kaushal over Herath was the sensible move for this match, but fans, along with Mathews will be pondering the what-ifs. Kaushal’s lines and lengths in the final session laid bare his inexperience. He went at 4.6 in his 20 overs.Running the drinks throughout the day, Herath looked more at home in those bibs supporting players have to wear, than in his unaccessorised cricket kit. His words to an uninspired Mathews during each drinks break grew more voluminous as the afternoon wore on. With the benefit a little amateur lip-reading and imagination, we might surmise he said something like: “Do you wish you never dropped me now, you boring doofus? Wouldn’t it be nice to have a spinner who consistently pitched the ball in the same time zone as the batsman?” Maybe this is using a little too much imagination. Herath’s comments were probably more constructive – something like: “Would it be ok, if, just once in a while, you captained with more zest and creativity than a lamp post?”The thing with Mathews for now, is that you can’t really have the slamming batsman without the ka-blamming strategist. He is iron-willed and granite-hearted at the crease, letting little to faze him, much less shake him from his batting plan. Those virtues can be liabilities when he is leading on the field. As on Monday, he has not reacted quickly to worsening situations. He’s shown little capacity for innovation. Sri Lanka fans are left hoping that, along with pretty much everything else in this team, Mathews improves tactically over time. The worst of his detractors though, might be reminded that if it weren’t for his second-innings ton, Sri Lanka might have already lost this match.In the morning, he had made a raid for a 400 lead, showing disappointment as the lower order played 2015 Imran Khan like he was 1980s Imran Khan. Perhaps that frantic Pakistan chase in Sharjah last year played on his mind. Either way, Mathews seems like the kind of captain who needs a gigantic lead, an ace bowler, and for the army to be shooting mortars at the batsmen, to feel comfortable attacking without relent, for a long period of time.On a pitch that has given the bowlers plenty all game, 376 should be more than enough to claim victory. It may still turn out that way, if Sri Lanka can gather themselves overnight, and set out with intent on Tuesday. Dinesh Chandimal, whose 67 alongside Mathews seemed to have put Sri Lanka in an outstanding position, said the team would even have settled for far fewer runs.”We actually thought we had enough,” Chandimal said. “At the start, we thought if we could put 300 on the board, we could win the match. But after my partnership with Angelo, we thought, ‘No, we can go to 400’. That way we could completely lock them out of the match. Unfortunately we couldn’t get to 400. But 376 is a great total, and what should be a winning total in the fourth innings. There’s one more day to play, and we’re hoping to get a couple of wickets in the morning and move towards victory.”There are 17 overs to play before the second new ball is available. With Pakistan so far ahead in the game now, though, Sri Lanka can’t wait that long to make headway. “When the ball was hard, the seamers had something from the pitch,” Chandimal said. “But after about 30 overs, there wasn’t much for them. The seam movement disappeared. In the last hour and a half, we saw quite a bit of turn from Kaushal. I’m hoping Kaushal will get us two or three wickets before the new ball is available.”Pakistan will look to their epic chase in Sharjah for their encouragement. Sri Lanka, to Pakistan’s collapse in Galle in 2009 for theirs. Both series between these teams last year produced at least one sublime finish. Maybe it will be so again.

Warner, Khawaja run NZ ragged

ESPNcricinfo staff13-Nov-2015That was to be the visitors’ lone success for a long time, as Warner was in a punishing mood•Getty ImagesHe was well supported by Khawaja, who while being reprieved twice, ensured the scoring-rate didn’t drop•Getty ImagesNew Zealand’s bowlers and fielders were left clueless about what had hit them•Getty ImagesIt wasn’t long before Warner completed his third-consecutive century, off 118 balls•Getty ImagesKhawaja joined the party to score his second Test hundred, but he was eventually dismissed by Doug Bracewell with less than four overs to go for the day•Getty ImagesWarner, however, continued to pummel the bowling, and remained unbeaten on 244 off 272 balls, as Australia finished the day on 416 for 2, scoring at 4.62 runs per over•Getty Images

Malik's best, Shafiq equals Sobers

Stats highlights from the second day’s play of the first Test between Pakistan and England in Abu Dhabi.

Shiva Jayaraman14-Oct-20151:24

By the Numbers – The Comeback King

8 Double-hundreds by Pakistan’s No. 3 in Tests before Shoaib Malik’s 245 in this match. The last Pakistan No. 3 to make a double-hundred was Azhar Ali, who made 226 against Bangladesh in Dhaka earlier this year. Malik’s score is the fourth-highest by a Pakistan No.3 in Tests. Younis Khan’s 313 against Sri Lanka in Karachi in 2009 is the highest.1987 The last time a Pakistan batsman made a higher score in Tests against England than Malik’s 245 in this innings. Javed Miandad had made 260 in the first innings of the Oval Test. The only other Pakistan batsman to score higher than Malik in Tests against England is Zaheer Abbas, who made 274 at Edgbaston in 1971.200 Malik’s highest first-class score before his 245 in this Test. He had made 200 against Faisalabad in the 2010-11 Quaid-e-Azam Trophy playing for PIA. He now has 1851 runs in Tests at an average of 37.77, which has jumped up from his average of 33.45 before this Test.163 Runs conceded by Adil Rashid in Pakistan’s first innings. Rashid bowled 34 overs without taking a wicket. These are the worst bowling figures in an innings on Test debut by any bowler. The previous-worst was by Australia’s Bryce McGain who conceded 149 runs in the first innings of the Cape Town Test in 2009. From England, Devon Malcolm is the only bowler to have conceded more runs than Rashid in an innings on Test debut. Malcolm had conceded 166 runs on his debut against Australia in the 1989 Ashes Test at Trent Bridge.8 Hundreds by Asad Shafiq in Tests, all of which have come batting at No. 6 for Pakistan. This now equals the most centuries made by any batsman batting at No. 6 in Tests. Garry Sobers too, had made eight of 26 Test hundreds batting at No. 6. Shafiq has scored 2247 runs at No.6 – the most from that position by any Pakistan batsman – at an average of 46.81.1986 The last time a Pakistan No. 6 made a century against England in Tests. Imran Khan had made 118 in the first innings of the Oval Test. Including Shafiq’s hundred in this match, there have been only six Test hundreds by Pakistan’s No. 6 against England.Most Test hundreds by teams in the last 12 months.•ESPNcricinfo Ltd297 runs conceded by England spinners in the first innings – the most conceded spinners in an innings without taking a wicket. The previous highest was the 273 runs that South Africa’s spinners conceded against Sri Lanka at the SSC in 2006. England’s spinners had economy of 4.30 from the 69 overs they bowled in Pakistan’s first innings.248 Runs scored by the stand between Malik and Shafiq – Pakistan’s fourth-highest for their fifth wicket in Tests. The highest such stand came in 1976 against New Zealand when Asif Iqbal and Javed Miandad added 281 in the first innings in Lahore. Including the one in this match, there have been only seven double-hundred stands for Pakistan’s fifth wicket in Tests. This was also Pakistan’s sixth-highest partnership for any wicket against England in Tests.236 The previous highest partnership for any wicket in Tests at the Sheik Zayed Stadium, which was between Azhar Ali and Younis Khan against Australia last year. Pakistan’s fifth-wicket partnership is now the highest and only the fourth double-hundred stand for any wicket at this venue. The stand between Malik and Shafiq is also the third-highest for any wicket in Tests in the UAE.236 The previous highest by a Pakistan batsman in the UAE, which was by Taufeeq Umar against Sri Lanka in 2011 in Abu Dhabi. Malik’s 245 is now the highest score and the second highest by any batsman in Tests in the UAE. AB de Villiers’ 278* against Pakistan at the same venue in 2010 is the highest.3 Consecutive 500-plus totals posted by Pakistan while batting first in Abu Dhabi, including their 523 for 8 in this match. They had declared on 566 for 3 against New Zealand last year and had made 570 for 6 against Australia before that. Overall, this is Pakistan’s fourth 500-plus total in the first innings in eight Tests at this venue.4/57 Ben Stokes’ bowling figures in Pakistan’s first innings – the second-best by a fast bowler against Pakistan in Abu Dhabi and only the third four-wicket haul at this venue. Stuart Broad’s 4 for 47 in England’s previous Test here is the best.26 Number of hundreds by Pakistan batsmen in Tests in the last 12 months – easily the most by any team in this period. Australia and India are a distant second with 14 hundreds.16 Number of centuries by Pakistan batsmen at the Sheikh Zayed Stadium in just eight Tests. These are the most hundreds scored by batsmen from a team in eight or fewer Tests at a venue. The next highest are India’s 12 centuries from eight Tests at the SSC, Colombo.

The toss debate: aiding spin v home advantage

County captains Rob Key and Andrew Gale speak for and against getting rid of the mandatory coin toss in the County Championship next season

Interviews by David Hopps and George Dobell02-Dec-2015Rob KeyWe had to do something. It got to the stage where some teams were risking everything on the toss. There was period at Cheltenham where whoever won the toss won the game. We had a bit of a heatwave last summer, but despite it not raining for a month, we played three Championship games in a row without our spinners – who are two of the best in the country – and we were right to do so. The pitches were so green.Counties like to talk about doing the right thing for the game, but they also want to get out of Division Two and they end up doing what is best for their side. When I started playing, every county had a good spinner. Nobody would claim that’s the case now.This is not just about encouraging spin. We hope to create conditions that are more like international cricket. Batting has changed massively since I started playing, and opening the batting has never been harder. It’s not that the bowlers are better – there are fewer really good overseas and Kolpak bowlers around – but the [batting] conditions are very tough.When I started, quite a few people would score 1600 or so first-class runs a season, and Mark Ramprakash would score 2000. Now you’re doing well if you scrape to 1000. The conditions are changing techniques. We want to encourage pace and skill in fast bowling and by doing that, prepare batsmen for Test cricket. And yes, we want to encourage spin.

“If we see 15 wickets fall to seam bowling on the first day of a game, nobody bats an eye. But if the ball turns on day one, people start to worry”Rob Key

My original view was that we should have tougher penalties for poor pitches. But that is so hard to police. It just becomes a minefield. But what I still think is that the stigma over spinning pitches has to end. If we see 15 wickets fall to seam bowling on the first day of a game, nobody bats an eye. But if the ball turns on day one, people start to worry. That has to stop.The cricket committee had a two-day meeting and 90% of it was spent talking about pitches. We went through all the options. We talked about everything you have seen suggested on social media. And in the end everyone there agreed that this was the way to go. The rules governing the use of the heavy roller are remaining the same.We want to stop counties producing pitches that just suit their seamers. We want to take that luxury away from them and instead get them to produce pitches that result in a more even battle between bat and ball and require pace and spin bowlers as well as seamers.I’m not surprised by the negative reactions. They are the same reactions I had when I first heard the suggestion. But it was not a decision taken lightly, and I’d just say to people: let’s try it and see what happens. Our original suggestion to the ECB board was to try this for a year in Division Two. It was their idea to try it in Division One as well.We’re not suddenly going to see five more spinners. We can’t expect a miracle cure. But we might see a situation where, instead of spinners bowling 20% of overs in the Championship, they might bowl 30%.It’s not just the pitches, even the scheduling doesn’t favour spinners•Getty ImagesAndrew GaleI admire that the ECB cricket committee are trying to do something, but there is lots about this decision that troubles me. I thought that the ECB were gaining a reputation for consulting more widely with the counties, but we heard nothing about this. We heard rumours it could happen in Division Two and suddenly it was introduced in the First Division as well.It’s a decision that has come straight after a Test series defeat in the UAE, which has brought the problems to everyone’s attention. But we don’t want subcontinent-paced wickets in England. That is not what people want to watch. If we had gone to Australia and won this close season, I doubt that this decision would have happened.Obviously the rule has been brought in to encourage spinners and because of a recognition that the wickets have become too seamer-friendly. The intention is a good one – I know that. But if wickets are that bad, why haven’t points been docked? Fifteen-plus wickets have fallen many times on the first day and it has repeatedly been put down to bad batting. I can see Keysie’s point about something needing to be done, but why haven’t pitch inspectors done their job properly? It comes down to people being strong.

“You only need to dock a couple of points for a pitch that starts excessively damp and it will soon persuade counties that the risk is not worth taking”Andrew Gale

The problem is much bigger in Division Two. You can understand why some counties do it, because, ultimately, the need is to get out of the division and to win matches during a demanding schedule, which can stretch pace-bowling resources. But there are certain grounds where it happens day after day. You know who they are. You only need to dock a couple of points for a pitch that starts excessively damp and it will soon persuade counties that the risk is not worth taking. Yorkshire had an eight-point deduction for a substandard pitch at Scarborough in 2000, and our director of cricket, Martyn Moxon, has been scarred by it ever since.I’d guess that 90% of cricket in Division One is played on good wickets. They left the grass on at the Ageas Bowl last season, but it was not damp. You could see they knew their own square and they were just trying to encourage pace and carry. We played another game at Arundel where the pitch was so slow, our second slip had to stand so close he wore a helmet. Spinners might have wheeled away for hours on that one, but it wouldn’t necessarily have done much good.The fact is that the schedule, as it stands, does not encourage spinners. When you play most of your games in early or late season, you aggravate the problem. How can Durham, as the northernmost county, produce spinning pitches at this time of year? The climate is against it. It’s very hard to do that at Headingley, and our groundsman, Andy Fogarty, has just won the Groundsman of the Year award. When it is overcast at Headingley and the ball starts playing tricks for the pace bowlers, it doesn’t matter how dry the pitch is, it’s hard as a captain to throw the ball to Adil Rashid to bowl legspin. When we did play some games in midsummer, at Hove and Lord’s, he bowled a lot of overs.Next season when it is overcast at Headingley, we won’t get a 50-50 chance to bowl first. Sport is about using home advantage where you can, to try to build your ground into a fortress. Look at Manchester United under Sir Alex Ferguson, with a big playing surface and fast wingers. That is what makes professional sport so good to watch. Winning away from home should be a challenge.I am a traditionalist. I love Championship cricket. The toss has existed since the beginning of time. Why keep messing with the game? It’s too complicated for some people as it is.

'Afghanistan needs to organise international cricket at home'

Inzamam-ul-Haq talks about his short and successful stint as the team’s coach, and what they need to do to match the best sides in the world

Danyal Rasool16-May-2016Less than an hour before my interview with Inzamam-ul-Haq, I was watching him on television. He was conducting his first press conference in his new role as Pakistan’s chief selector after shortlisting 35 names for a training camp ahead of the side’s tour of England this summer, from which the final squad would be picked. Ahmed Shehzad and Umar Akmal, talented yet profligate batsmen, had been omitted. Inzamam didn’t seem too shy about laying down a marker.I’m sitting in Inzamam’s drawing room, and he enters dressed in a shalwar kameez and house slippers. Despite the short time between the press conference and our meeting, he shows no signs of being rushed; the feeling that he always had a little extra time clearly wasn’t confined to his batting.His tale of his stint as Afghanistan coach begins, rather improbably, in Saudi Arabia. “I was at the Hajj last year when Afghanistan called me,” he says. “Kabir Khan [former Afghanistan coach] approached me previously too, asking me to become Afghanistan’s coach, but I had declined. Afghanistan isn’t your average country in terms of the challenges you’re presented with. So when I received the call this time, I told them I’d take on the role, but only for the Zimbabwe tour [in October 2015]. I had no prior experience in coaching, so I wanted to see how I handled it before agreeing to any full-time contract. By the grace of Allah, we won both the ODI and T20 series. They offered me a three-year contract, but I didn’t want anything too long term, so I signed on for one year.”

“The Afghan boys don’t mind hitting the gym. They are also great foodies, and after all that hard work they’ll go in and polish off a whole barbecued lamb or two for dinner”

Inzamam’s six months as Afghanistan coach coincided with one of the most successful spells, statistically, in the country’s short cricketing history. They won 12 out of 17 T20Is, including all five against Zimbabwe and a stunning upset of eventual world champions West Indies at the World T20 this year. In ten ODIs during Inzamam’s stint, all against Zimbabwe, Afghanistan won six, winning series home and away. It was a stellar run, and, after putting it down to “good luck” in typically modest fashion, Inzamam reveals what he thinks were the two biggest factors behind the impressive numbers.”As soon as I became coach, we had a very busy run of fixtures coming up, so I focused on the things I thought would bring short-term success. I didn’t attempt to fix their techniques – you can’t do that overnight. I tried instead to change their approach to the game. For example, their satisfaction levels were very low. They were content to score 30-35 runs and get out, feeling they had done enough. I told them it was criminal to get out once they were set, had their eye in, and had begun to understand the pitch and conditions.”Secondly, cricket has become so much faster that the value of running singles, and the art of rotating the strike, has become a little lost. But I believe that any player capable of taking multiple singles per over will never feel too much pressure. I believe that was instrumental to our success.”The sense that coaching Afghanistan is no ordinary job looms large again as Inzamam talks about being forced to rely on second-hand knowledge regarding the state of cricket within the country. “I only spent one day in Afghanistan during my time as coach, and that was to sign my contract,” he says. “Obviously that meant I was dependent on their selectors and local coaches. Instead of hand-picking the boys who I thought could make the grade, I was sent players [to Afghanistan’s training base in Sharjah] who had performed well in domestic cricket in Afghanistan, but they did give me the final say regarding selection.””I tried to change their approach to the game. They were content to score 30-35 runs and get out, feeling they had done enough”•Getty ImagesHe stresses on the importance of a strong first-class system, directly linking it to international success, and praises Afghanistan for the strides they have made in this department. “They have organised formal ODI and T20 tournaments in the country. In addition, they’ve established approximately 40 cricket grounds across the country to give people the opportunity to play the game. They’ve invested in turf pitches. They’ve built a stadium in Jalalabad, and they recognise the value of a good first-class system.”And so they should. If these sorts of developments to safeguard their future weren’t taking place, all of their good work could be undone very quickly.” He emphasises the point with a warning: “Even Kenya played a World Cup semi-final once.”When the conversation moves to the possibility of Afghanistan attaining Test status in the next decade, he draws a comparison with a team he is rather more familiar with. “Look,” he says, with a hint of fatalism in his voice, “the reason Pakistan cricket is down in the dumps at present is the absence of virtually any international cricket here. And Pakistan has been an established Test side for over six decades. Afghanistan cricket is in its infancy. If they want to reach the levels that Test sides are expected to be at, they have to organise international cricket there. They to.”Maybe they could attract some of the up-and-comers in Associate circles to visit. But if they fail in that task, I simply don’t believe they can continue to progress like they’re capable.”It is imperative that Afghanistan cricket does well. You cannot imagine how passionate Afghanistan’s fans are, and how they live and die by every result.”I remember whenever we won a match, [Asghar] Stanikzai used to address the nation on television, pleading with them not to celebrate with gunfire, because on one occasion five people died during the festivities. Around the cricket world, we might not think too much of Asghar or Mohammad Nabi, but they are absolute megastars in Afghanistan. After we won in Zimbabwe, 15,000 people came to the airport to receive the team. They were taken directly to the stadium in Kabul, which was jam-packed, not to watch a cricket match but simply to give their heroes a homecoming.”

“It’s crucial that the ICC provides these Associate nations with quality coaches. A lot of the players I worked with have technical flaws and kinks in their batting that a good coach could easily have ironed out at Under-19 level”

One of the more charming features of Associate cricket is the level of camaraderie and togetherness among players from the various teams, and a recognition of the mutual challenges their fellow “second-class citizens” face. Given that every story requires a villain, many view the ICC as having filled that role with regard to the Associates, standing like a surly security guard outside a members-only party, refusing to let the intruders in, no matter how meticulously they appear to follow the dress code. Inzamam’s criticism of the ICC’s role, however, is far more tempered and nuanced.”I do think the ICC has financially helped Afghanistan and Ireland a lot, but I think it’s crucial that the ICC provides these Associate nations with quality coaches to work on their basics. A lot of the players I worked with have technical flaws and kinks in their batting that a good coach could easily have ironed out at Under-19 level, or in first-class cricket. But years of those shortcomings being left unchecked results in them being entrenched into the players’ batting techniques, and then they become extremely difficult to remedy, especially at international level, the level at which I have worked. If the ICC were to do that more frequently, I think it would make a huge difference to all Associate nations.”The topic of the players’ fitness requires tact and poise; it is Inzamam I’m talking to, after all. But a smile crosses his lips when I mention the word. “I remember before the 2003 World Cup, I worked extremely hard on my fitness,” he recalls. “A great deal of training and dietary discipline. I believe I lost 19kg. And 19 is the number of runs I scored in the entire tournament.”I only spent one day in Afghanistan during my time as coach, and that was to sign my contract”•Danyal RasoolNot that he means to discount the importance of fitness. “The Afghan boys are very hard-working, and they don’t mind hitting the gym,” he says. “They naturally have a strong, athletic build, which helps in a number of cricketing departments. But they are also great foodies, and after all that hard work they’ll go in and polish off a whole barbecued lamb or two for dinner. Next day, when the sun is out and you have to be fielding, the meat absorbs a lot of water in your body, making you extremely thirsty. So you have to be more professional if you want to take the next step in your progress.”Inzamam speaks of the players’ almost reverential respect for him, and their humility; these are young men who, in their country, are about as big a deal as Sachin Tendulkar is in India. He speaks about the country with great affection, and it is clear he desires to see the team succeed. His pride at their results under his tutelage speaks of his genuine satisfaction at being able to help a team and a nation he developed a great fondness for.All the more relevant to ask: when all seemed to be going swimmingly well, why did Inzamam leave Afghanistan cricket a few months ahead of time?The ensuing silence is longer than at any stage during the evening; he clearly didn’t take the decision, or his response, lightly. “I coached Afghanistan for seven months. Out of those, I spent five and a half away from home. After retiring from all forms of cricket in 2008, I took up no other assignments till this Afghanistan job. With young children, it was very difficult to spend all that time away from my family, and I didn’t want that to continue. So when the PCB approached me, I thought it was best to take up their offer, and Afghanistan were extremely understanding and generous. I still have a great relationship with the people I worked with.”Inzamam’s strongest conviction appeared to be his assertion that Afghanistan cricket cannot remain on the road to progress without international cricket being played in the country. And yet, he himself spent just a day in the country.For all his optimism, it is hard not to view Afghanistan’s cricket, and the scope for its development, in its geopolitical context. Many of the boys Inzamam interacted with became men before they picked up cricket equipment; indeed, long before boys should become men. This is a country whose scars aren’t symbolic, nor are they the remnants of mere sporting failure. They aren’t just any cricket team, they are an Associate nation; and not just any Associate nation, they are Afghanistan.Inzamam’s stint might have seemed all too short, but to those Afghans who live day to day, players and spectators alike, it will have lasted an eternity. What might they have achieved together if he had stayed the duration?

Mitchell Marsh proves his big-game credentials

Australia’s all-round balance in ODIs might be shifting, with James Faulkner dropped for the tri-series final and Mitchell Marsh named Man of the Match

Brydon Coverdale27-Jun-2016On Sunday evening in Barbados, Australia lifted another one-day trophy. It was a fine achievement but not a new one: they have more silverware than Downton Abbey. In the past 18 months they have won a home tri-series, a World Cup, a series in England, a home campaign against India and now a tri-series in the West Indies. Only the Chappell-Hadlee Trophy slipped between their fingers.They are the No.1-ranked ODI side in the world by quite a margin, so it is not especially remarkable that they won this series. All the same, there were notable Australian sub-plots. There was the dropping of Glenn Maxwell, followed by his stunning display upon recall. There was the continued emergence of Adam Zampa as an exciting spinner with boundless confidence.And there was the ongoing balancing act concerning James Faulkner and Mitchell Marsh. Not long ago, Faulkner was one of the first men Australia would pick for a must-win ODI, the classic big-game player. Just look at the World Cup final last year: Faulkner was Man of the Match for his 3 for 36, destroying New Zealand’s middle order and their hopes of lifting the trophy.Throughout that tournament Faulkner was preferred to Marsh as a pace-bowling allrounder, the conventional wisdom being they couldn’t both squeeze into an XI that at the time also featured Shane Watson. Only once in that World Cup did Faulkner and Marsh play together, against Afghanistan, when experimenting was unlikely to matter.The retirement of Watson made things a little easier, and most of Australia’s ODIs in 2016 have featured Marsh, a batting allrounder typically at No.6, and Faulkner, a bowling allrounder at 7 or 8. But come the final of this tri-series against West Indies, the selectors decided that Faulkner was not part of their best XI. In his absence another big-game player emerged: Marsh was Man of the Match.Justin Langer, Australia’s coach for this tour, said in the lead-up to this final that Marsh had the talent to eventually become Australia’s No.4 batsman in all formats. Already they had moved Marsh up to No.5 at the back end of this series and he rewarded them with an unbeaten 79 in the win against West Indies to qualify for the final.Come the decider, Marsh walked to the crease at 120 for 3 in the 25th over, with some steadying required. Marsh steered Australia through those middle overs with 32 off 45 balls and in doing so reached 1000 ODI runs – in one fewer innings than it took Ricky Ponting. But his biggest contribution came in West Indies’ chase. Called on in the 12th over, Marsh went for a single run from his first two overs, before switching ends and claiming three wickets in three overs.And they weren’t just any wickets: Darren Bravo, centurion from West Indies’ previous game, edged behind; Marlon Samuels, who had tormented Australia with 92 and 125 in their last two meetings, was undone by a slower ball; and then Johnson Charles, trying to guide the chase on 45, was trapped lbw. West Indies were 72 for 4, and Australia had one hand on the trophy.”We knew, after our batting innings, that bowling from this end was going to be a lot easier for the bowlers, because it was quite thatchy up that end and the cross-seam balls were catching on the wicket a little bit,” Marsh said after the win. “We tried to utilise this end and it came off for us.”I haven’t really taken a wicket all series, so it was nice to get a few tonight. I’m just enjoying the challenge of batting a bit higher up the order in the last couple of games … Tonight I got an opportunity to bowl up front and try and be a bit attacking, and it came off.”It was the continuation of an excellent 2016 for Marsh in ODI cricket, after he scored his maiden hundred against India at the SCG in January. Marsh is Australia’s third-leading run scorer in ODIs this year (428 at 53.50), behind only Steven Smith and David Warner, and their second top wicket-taker (14 at 33.50) behind Josh Hazlewood.By comparison, Faulkner has 10 wickets at 47.50 and has had few real chances with the bat, scoring 64 runs at 21.33 from seven innings. He is a far better player than that, a bowler who can turn a match in one spell, as Marsh did in this final, and one of the finest batting finishers in the world. He just needs to start grabbing his opportunities again, as Marsh has done.Faulkner is too good a player to be left out for long, and will no doubt find his way back into the XI soon. But the more big strides Marsh continues to take, the more Faulkner will need to lift as well. Specifically, he needs wickets to encourage the selectors that he is a better option than a specialist fast bowler like Nathan Coulter-Nile, who was recalled for the tri-series final.In a squad that also features Maxwell, balancing the all-round options won’t get any easier for Australia’s selectors.

A test of technique, not temperament, for Ballance

England’s selectors have picked character more than numbers with a recall for Gary Ballance for the first Test against Pakistan

Andrew McGlashan07-Jul-2016England’s selectors seemingly had two paths they could follow in filling the vacancy in the batting order for the first Test against Pakistan. They could have gone the x-factor route – throw convention out the window and recall Jos Buttler based on his limited-overs form – or reward heavy scoring in the County Championship.In the end they have done neither. Instead, they have recalled Gary Ballance who is now set to return to Test cricket for the first time since last year’s Ashes but in the middle order rather than at No. 3.Timing certainly appears to be everything. This week Ballance made 132 against a Middlesex attack that – it turns out – included two members of the Test squad, Steven Finn and Toby Roland-Jones, which followed 78 against Durham the match before. Scott Borthwick, heavily tipped a few weeks ago, made his third single-figure score in his last three Championship innings.Still, Borthwick has 585 runs at 58.50 with three hundreds this season and Ballance 471 runs at 33.64. Ballance was the spare batsman in South Africa, but he was not deemed ready for a recall against Sri Lanka earlier this season, instead James Vince filling the middle-order spot created by James Taylor’s retirement.Selection, though, is more than about the numbers on a page. “What he does have is that hard edge,” Alastair Cook said. “Gary is mentally strong,” added national selector James Whitaker. That cannot be doubted. On debut he stood up to Mitchell Johnson’s pace at the SCG and in his next Test, against Sri Lanka at Lord’s, reached his maiden century with a six in the final over of the day.Blooding an uncapped batsman against Pakistan’s attack would have brought its own risks; this was the conundrum England had left themselves after the gamble to stick with Nick Compton – while it was not without reason – backfired as he limped through the Sri Lanka series. Ballance knows the Test game and should not be overawed by the occasion; a test of technique more so than temperament.And it was not as though the runs had completely dried up when he was left out after the second Test against Australia last summer. The match before, he made a vital 61 on the opening day in Cardiff, in a potentially series-defining partnership, to help England recover from their early wobble and set up what would be a match-winning total.Yet nagging doubts remain, particularly because of the make-up of Pakistan’s attack. It was the full length and late movement of New Zealand’s Trent Boult which began Ballance’s problems – removing him three times in four innings – and over the next few weeks he will face Mohammad Amir and, most likely, Wahab Riaz which will provide him with a similar challenge.The selectors could have reinvented the thinking of Test selection by recalling Buttler without any first-class cricket since October but ultimately have stuck with convention and decided he needs some red-ball matches. Even with this squad there are rumblings about the value of County Championship runs with the leading scorers around the country ignored, so skipping the system completely would have raised further questions. The narrative now divides with the spotlight remaining on Jonny Bairstow’s glovework while Buttler returns to domestic cricket for Lancashire.Trevor Bayliss has got his way over the No. 3 spot with Joe Root being elevated. “He would want to do it,” Bayliss said a few days ago. Alastair Cook revealed he had a few beers with Root after the Sri Lanka series and that he was keen to make the move. There is no reason why Root, one of the most adaptable batsmen in the world, should not be able to make a success of first drop. It makes more sense for him to be there than Vince, who had a lean series against Sri Lanka and could soon be the under-pressure batsman in the side.But there remains a sense of uncertainty around the Test top order. In the last four series there have been significant changes; Ballance dropped in the Ashes, Bairstow for Buttler in the UAE, Compton and Taylor in for South Africa, Vince called up against Sri Lanka and now back to Ballance. England will hope that by the end of this series there is a bit more clarity, although Amir and Yasir Shah may have something to say about that.

Azam, spinners leave West Indies shortchanged

ESPNcricinfo staff30-Sep-2016Sharjeel Khan offset the early loss and dominated in a second-wicket stand of 82 with Babar Azam•Getty ImagesSharjeel fell for a 43-ball 54 after an attempted slog went awry as he was held at short third man•Getty ImagesSunil Narine sent back Shoaib Malik with a carrom ball to leave Pakistan wobbling at 93 for 3 in the 18th over•AFPSarfaraz Ahmed and Azam then rebuilt with a 99-run fourth-wicket stand•AFPJason Holder broke the stand, but Azam switched to top gear and blazed away to his maiden international century..•Getty Images… until Kieron Pollard snaffled a stunner at wide long-on to send him back for 120•Getty ImagesA floodlight failure then paused play for over an hour. When it resumed, Pakistan lost wickets and stuttered to 284 for 9•AFPMohammad Amir hurt West Indies’ chase of a revised 287 with the wicket of Johnson Charles in the eighth over•Getty ImagesDebutant Kraigg Brathwaite hung around nervously until he nicked Hasan Ali to the keeper to leave West Indies on 41 for 2•AFPWith the asking rate escalating, West Indies fell into the trap of looking to attack the spinners•Getty ImagesThat West Indies’ highest-partnership was 35 for the fourth wicket between Denesh Ramdin and Marlon Samuels highlighted their struggle•Getty ImagesWhile spinners crippled West Indies, Wahab Riaz rattled the lower order in a hostile spell of fast bowling•Getty ImagesNawaz finished with figures of 4 for 42 as Pakistan dismissed West Indies for 175 in 38.4 overs and ran away to a 111-run win•Getty Images

England's 477: the highest total to end in an innings defeat

Stats highlights from India’s record-breaking victory over England in Chennai

Bharath Seervi20-Dec-20160 Number of bigger first-innings totals than England’s 477 in this match, which resulted in an innings defeat. The previous biggest such total was 432, also by England, at The Oval, in the 2001 Ashes. This is the sixth time a team has lost after scoring 400 or more in their first innings, and four of those are by England. In the previous Test of this series, at the Wankhede, England lost after scoring 400. England’s total is also the highest total, in any innings of the Test, to end in an innings defeat beating West Indies’ 463 while following on at Eden Gardens in 2011-12.18 Number of consecutive Tests without a defeat for India, their longest ever unbeaten run. Their previous longest unbeaten streak was between September 1985 and March 1987. However, they had won only four matches in that 17-Test run, compared to this sequence which has had 14 wins. Click here for the list of longest unbeaten sequences, which is topped by West Indies – 27 matches without a defeat from 1982 to 1984.2 Instances of India winning four Tests in a series – the Border-Gavaskar Trophy in 2012-13 (four-match series), and this five-match series. The previous time England lost four or more Tests in a series was in the 2013-14 Ashes.1 This was Ravindra Jadeja’s first ten-wicket haul in Test cricket. He took 10 for 154 in this Test, including 7 for 48 in the second innings, both career-best figures. His previous best innings figures was 6 for 138 in Durban in 2013-14.India are unbeaten in their last 18 consecutive Tests•ESPNcricinfo Ltd6 Number of times Ravindra Jadeja dismissed Cook in this series. It is the most an India bowler has dismissed a particular batsman in a series. Cook averaged just 12.50 against Jadeja in the series. There have been 20 other instances of an India bowler dismissing a batsman five times in a series, including R Ashwin against Ben Stokes in this series.0 Number of captains who have led India in more successive Tests without a defeat than Virat Kohli with 18. Sunil Gavaskar had also led in 18 consecutive Tests without a loss, his first 18 Tests in charge from 1976 to 1980. Kapil Dev had a 17-Test run without a defeat. Kohli had two defeats in his first four Tests and no loss since then.1 Ravindra Jadeja became the first ever player to score a half-century or more, take 10 or more wickets and also take four or more catches in a Test. He scored 51 in the first innings, took 10 for 154 in the match plus a catch in first innings and three catches in second innings. Jadeja is in fact only the second India player after Kapil Dev to score a 50-plus and take ten-for in a Test. Kapil had also done it in Chennai, against Pakistan in 1979-80.9 Tests won by India this year – the most by them in any year. The previous best was eight wins in 2010. India ended the year unbeaten, in 12 Tests. Only England (11 wins) in 2004 and Australia (10 wins) in 2006 have more Tests in a year without losing any. On the other hand, this was England’s eighth Test defeat this year – the joint second-most for any team behind Bangladesh’s nine in 2003.25 Number of century opening partnerships Alastair Cook has been involved in – the most by any opener. He went past Jack Hobbs and Graeme Smith, who had been involved in 24 hundreds partnerships for the first wicket. Keaton Jennings is the 10th opening partner with whom Cook has shared a century partnership, which is also a record. The previous record was Graham Gooch’s nine partners.

Warner's incredible run in ODIs

David Warner’s century at the SCG was his fifth in his last ten ODI innings, while Australia’s score of 6 for 353 was the sixth time they went past 350 in a 50-over match at home

Shiva Jayaraman22-Jan-20175 Number of ODI centuries by David Warner this season – equals the most by an Australian batsman in any season. Matthew Hayden scored five hundreds in 25 ODIs in 2006-07.90 Number of ODI innings taken by Warner to hit 12 centuries – the third least by any batsman after Hashim Amla and Virat Kohli. Amla took 81 innings while Kohli took 83.5 Number of hundreds by Warner in his last ten ODI innings. He has scored 783 runs at an average of 78.30 in this span. There have only been six other 10-innings streaks in ODIs that have yielded more runs; Warner himself had a ten-innings sequence ending with his last innings of 2016 in which he made 839 runs at 83.90.6 Number of hundreds in international matches by Warner at SCG – the second-most by any batsman, behind Ricky Ponting’s eight. Greg Chappell and Hayden had five hundreds at the venue. While Warner has played only 24 innings at the SCG, Ponting, Chappell and Hayden played 69, 47 and 38 innings respectively. All of Warner’s hundreds, however, have come only since 2015, in his last 11 innings at this venue. He has made 819 runs in these 11 innings at an average of 81.90.David Warner’s bumper summer in ODIs•ESPNcricinfo Ltd82 Runs conceded by Junaid Khan – the most by any Pakistan bowler in ODIs in Australia and the most Junaid has conceded in any ODI. Mohammad Amir too produced his most expensive figures in ODIs. The 75 runs he conceded in this match are the fifth-highest by a Pakistan bowler in Australia. Pakistan fast bowlers conceded runs at an economy of 6.95 in this match – which was their second-worst in an ODI in Australia.337/7 Australia’s previous-highest total against Pakistan in ODIs – at the same venue in 1999-00. This is the eighth time any team has made 350-plus in ODI’s against Pakistan. This was Australia’s sixth score of 350 or more in ODIs at home. Four of them have come at the SCG.3 Number of instances when a bowler has taken a five-wicket haul in ODIs against the hosts at the SCG before Hasan Ali. The last time time it happened was in 1993, when Curtly Ambrose took 5 for 32. Michael Holding and Richard Hadlee are the other two bowlers to achieve this feat. Ali’s 5 for 52 in this match is his best figures and the first time he has taken a five-for in List-A matches.177.27 Glenn Maxwell’s strike-rate in his innings of 78 – the seventh time he has made 50 or more runs in an ODI innings at a strike of 150-plus. Five of these innings have come at a strike-rate of 175-plus.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus